|
Post by Cam Mott on Feb 1, 2020 14:06:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Feb 1, 2020 14:20:39 GMT -5
Thank you, Cam.
Full-out appalled. Sorry if it sounds like I’m being just a little political but Mike’s support for Donald Trump back at the last US election was unfortunate, but this is heartbreaking. What has possessed them to play this gig? (Yeah, I know, dollars, but…)
|
|
|
Post by AGD on Feb 1, 2020 14:24:28 GMT -5
Elliott Lott hasn't been the band's manager for some three years.
That said, have signed.
|
|
|
Post by filledeplage on Feb 1, 2020 15:24:17 GMT -5
This is a slippery slope in the USA to try to dictate what work someone can or cannot/should or should not accept. It would be OK if they were playing for Planned Parenthood, who tout that they are performing women’s “health care,” and have not one cancer screening mammogram machine in their network, for women’s health and who dismember and harvest organs from aborted fetuses and sell to the highest bidder, no less than the organ harvesting from the Yighurs or Falun Gong in China and organ trafficking elsewhere?
There are a lot of inequities. If it was a car show - someone would complain about an internal combustion engine. They would be shamed for climate change or global warming or the hole in the ozone.
While hunting is not my thing, I have no problem with the fishing aspect, and the concept of it as a family event. And, I’m more concerned with humans, who it seems, are no longer politically correct.
Where there are exploding populations of wildlife - like turkeys or geese in the cities, or the protected overpopulation of waterfowl, fouling the lakes and waterways, (which could be culled to feed the millions of those with food insecurity) and, where a kid can’t play on a playground; coyotes and disease-carrying, raccoons everywhere - I have no problem “thinning the herd.”
Shaming entertainers to decline work because they don’t agree with the theme of the convention or have TDS? Or, suggest they breach a contract because some don’t agree with the event?
If people want hunting (or fishing which is a part of this event) to stop - there is a way to do that. File legislation and get support for it. I think that this has just gone too far. It is an event - for a sport that is now legal. If people want it to not be legal - make that happen with laws. Bullying entertainers with social media - rather than legislation? I just think is the wrong way to go. There are strong feelings with this and I don’t expect much agreement on this, but that is ok. I’m looking at some of the legal aspects of being able to choose the work you do.
Fight for your cause - or legal change, not to control what another person does for work. JMHO
And if were anyone else sponsoring the event - no one would care. But they are DJT’s sons. Whatever else the sons are involved in - they have raised over $16 million for St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital which treats and researches childhood cancer. They were forced to give up that charitable work when their father went to the White House. So the hospital has to find ways of making up that money. No family gets a bill for care in that hospital. You never hear what good things people do - only magnify whatever people don’t agree with. The optics are bad - I will agree, but the hunting aspect is not the whole story.
|
|
|
Post by Cam Mott on Feb 1, 2020 20:56:32 GMT -5
I believe the Trumps had to give up their so-called charity because of confessed charity fraud with money meant for veterans and children cancer among others.
|
|
|
Post by filledeplage on Feb 1, 2020 21:10:12 GMT -5
I believe the Trumps had to give up their so-called charity because of confessed charity fraud with money meant for veterans and children cancer among others. Cam - I have no knowledge of the intricacies of any of that - this (St. Jude) was not their charity. Those organizations generally oversee any fundraising meeting with volunteers- going over every detail. The event, the venue, press releases, ticket sales, all of it. A while back I co-chaired a fundraiser for a similar charity (also a national one) and everything was overseen by them. And at the end of the night we handed them the check.
|
|
kirkk
Dude/Dudette
Posts: 74
Likes: 84
Favorite Album: Pet Sounds, SMiLE, Sunflower... but I could go on and on...
|
Post by kirkk on Feb 1, 2020 21:55:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by filledeplage on Feb 1, 2020 22:17:15 GMT -5
Thanks - above my pay grade! There must have been some expectation that the golf course would be comped. The venue we used, did not comp, either (although we did get a lot of donations) and the ticket had to allow dinner coverage along with the donation. I can tell you that it was easily six months of part-time work to make the event I was involved in, a success. Eric has donated a lot of money to St. Jude for pediatric cancer research, regardless of the “creative accounting” that may have gone down. Tragically, a lot of organizations with non-profit status, have come to look like money-laundering industries with big salaries at the top. Not living wages, but “living large” salaries. Thanks again, for that article.
|
|
Departed
Former Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2020 22:52:23 GMT -5
[cross-post from another board] I think it's very thoughtless of Mike to attend pro-trophy hunting event. He (and those in the management team) should've known that a lot of people wouldn't tolerate those who kill for fun, and on business perspective, this would hurt the band's brand and immensely damage future revenue from touring and merchandise. That being said, take a look at what the petition states: I can't quite agree with this, as this would surely affect the revenue of Brian, Al and Carl's estate who we're not sure have agreed with the attendance in the first place. Plus, those unfamiliar with the business side of the band might quit going to Brian and Al's show in protest against trophy hunting. The petition should've clarified that Mike and Bruce are the only ones currently tour as the the Beach Boys, and Brian and Al tours separately as a solo act. (You might be technically able to blame Brian on the grounds that Brian reportedly has voted for Mike to use the Beach Boys brand for touring, and receive some of the revenue( endlessharmony.boards.net/post/5522/thread), but I'm not willing to subscribe to that logic) Also, I'm not a big fan, or rather skeptic about this "cancel culture". Let's put it this way: Imagine that Mike's Beach Boys didn't withdraw from the event, their sales declined, and the record label actually disowned the band. Would it contribute to raise people's awareness against trophy hunting? I honestly doubt it. Rather, I could see backlash happening: "The band that made Pet Sounds got cancelled just because some of the members performed at pro-hunting event" would for sure be added to the list of "Nowadays you can't even say Merry Christmas". I believe people have every right to protest against hunting for fun etc, but it should be done in a way that would not socially exclude those who did the wrongdoings, or the backlash would be immense and original goal of the protest would be at stake. So, to sum it up: I agree that Mike should withdraw from pro-trophy hunting event, but I disagree that we should boycott The Beach Boys. Thus I had to refrain from signing the petition.
|
|
|
Post by E on Feb 2, 2020 3:57:48 GMT -5
Odd, bearing in mind they have played pro-environmental gigs and have been vocal about such issues. Money talks - or maybe they think some of the Charlie Daniels band fame will rub off on them...
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Feb 2, 2020 4:20:56 GMT -5
REO Speedwagon withdrew from this event. I hope our band will do the same.
|
|
|
Post by Autotune on Feb 2, 2020 7:15:54 GMT -5
Didn’t sign. I won’t boycott the Beach Boys. Just like I wouldn’t boycott an old friend if he belonged to SCI.
That said, I *hope* they withdraw from it. But that’s as far as I’ll go.
|
|
|
Post by Cam Mott on Feb 2, 2020 7:46:13 GMT -5
Don't know what is going on. I don't like it on its face and it does not line up with their lifetime convictions it doesn't seem to me. So is this another case of something being not what it seems (see Shirtgate and C50), don't know how, or some mistake by their bookers (William Morris?) or seeming flat out hypocrisy? It is odd at the least.
|
|
|
Post by drbeachboy (Dirk) on Feb 2, 2020 8:02:40 GMT -5
It is more important to ban trophy hunting than to boycott a band. I do hope The Beach Boys cancel.
|
|
|
Post by Cam Mott on Feb 2, 2020 11:13:50 GMT -5
The SCI seems to see themselves as a conservancy group but their talking points also stress the alleged economic benefits of trophy hunting etc..
Maybe someone involved in the BB org is being woefully or willfully misled or misleading or I'm full of shite one way or another.
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Feb 2, 2020 11:44:48 GMT -5
Marketing flim-flam, Cam.
If they sold themselves as a body representing companies and enthusiasts who go shooting lions, tigers, elephants and other exotic species, no one would want to be seen to be aligned with them, even companies and enthusiasts who love shooting lions, tigers, elephants and other exotic species. PR exercise.
Sport dressed up as conservation.
If they were into conservation for the sake of conservation, they'd go and be conservationists instead of people who shoot things dead.
Bit like the arguments used for our grouse shooting moors here in the UK. For years they told us that managing the habitat for the red grouse, a game bird, benefitted many other species of upland breeding bird. They handily didn't tell us that they were deep-burning the peat, denuding the hills of trees and the other species that should thrive there. We've ended up with a mono culture upland and a landscape prone to flash-flooding for the sake of a few rich folk being able to shoot countless numbers of birds that are driven towards the guns. At the same time, birds of prey are being illegally killed so that they don't predate the artificially high numbers of grouse. Our other upland bird species continue to be in decline despite the grouse bags growing annually. Too great a price to pay.
Might be a different scenario but it's the same self-serving flim-flam being used to dress one activity as something else.
Sorry folks, getting too political.
|
|
|
Post by Mikie on Feb 2, 2020 11:49:01 GMT -5
We can sign the petition but just keep buying and downloading Beach Boys music, keep going to Beach Boys concerts, and keep buying Beach Boys merchandise! Meanwhile, the petition is out there letting Mike and Bruce know that a lot of people are opposed to the killing of animals. The Beach Boys may or may not withdraw from the SCI Convention based on the petition. I doubt they will by this Wednesday. The petition may come across to them as a "threat" or "blackmail" and resist it. As of this post, though, there's 27,140 signatures, they're looking for 7,000 more and shooting for 35,000.
|
|
|
Post by filledeplage on Feb 2, 2020 12:41:23 GMT -5
Marketing flim-flam, Cam.
If they sold themselves as a body representing companies and enthusiasts who go shooting lions, tigers, elephants and other exotic species, no one would want to be seen to be aligned with them, even companies and enthusiasts who love shooting lions, tigers, elephants and other exotic species. PR exercise.
Sport dressed up as conservation.
If they were into conservation for the sake of conservation, they'd go and be conservationists instead of people who shoot things dead.
Bit like the arguments used for our grouse shooting moors here in the UK. For years they told us that managing the habitat for the red grouse, a game bird, benefitted many other species of upland breeding bird. They handily didn't tell us that they were deep-burning the peat, denuding the hills of trees and the other species that should thrive there. We've ended up with a mono culture upland and a landscape prone to flash-flooding for the sake of a few rich folk being able to shoot countless numbers of birds that are driven towards the guns. At the same time, birds of prey are being illegally killed so that they don't predate the artificially high numbers of grouse. Our other upland bird species continue to be in decline despite the grouse bags growing annually. Too great a price to pay.
Might be a different scenario but it's the same self-serving flim-flam being used to dress one activity as something else.
Sorry folks, getting too political.
You’re all over the political aspect in conservation. So dishonest. As well as all these wild fires in areas where there has been no forestry maintenance, allowing underbrush to accumulate and slow burn un-noticed. We can learn from global ancestors... www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/20202/Jan/11/how-first-australians-ancient-knowledge-can-help-us-survive-the-bushfires-of-the-future
|
|
|
Post by Mikie on Feb 2, 2020 13:41:56 GMT -5
If they were into conservation for the sake of conservation, they'd go and be conservationists instead of people who shoot things dead.
Gotta agree with this. Bruce is a founding advisory board member of the Surfrider Foundation. He should just stick with that.
|
|
|
Post by Cam Mott on Feb 2, 2020 13:48:10 GMT -5
We can sign the petition but just keep buying and downloading Beach Boys music, keep going to Beach Boys concerts, and keep buying Beach Boys merchandise! Meanwhile, the petition is out there letting Mike and Bruce know that a lot of people are opposed to the killing of animals. The Beach Boys may or may not withdraw from the SCI Convention based on the petition. I doubt they will by this Wednesday. The petition may come across to them as a "threat" and resist it. As of this post, though, there's 27,140 signatures, they're looking for 7,000 more and shooting for 35,000. If it does happen, for whatever reason, maybe all performance fee could be donated to a animal conservancy group other than SCI.
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Feb 2, 2020 15:34:00 GMT -5
We can sign the petition but just keep buying and downloading Beach Boys music, keep going to Beach Boys concerts, and keep buying Beach Boys merchandise! Meanwhile, the petition is out there letting Mike and Bruce know that a lot of people are opposed to the killing of animals. The Beach Boys may or may not withdraw from the SCI Convention based on the petition. I doubt they will by this Wednesday. The petition may come across to them as a "threat" and resist it. As of this post, though, there's 27,140 signatures, they're looking for 7,000 more and shooting for 35,000. If it does happen, for whatever reason, maybe all performance fee could be donated to a animal conservancy group other than SCI. And royalties from music sales for, say, a year?
|
|
|
Post by filledeplage on Feb 2, 2020 16:33:32 GMT -5
The change.org petition photo at the top was two of the Trump sons. A trigger. Yes, they are involved but the organization has nothing on their site with that photo. This looks like a googled photo to whip up a media narrative. This man has an organization against trophy hunting and appears to be exploiting this event to raise his own organization’s profile. It looks more political than anything. He is not some anonymous animal activist. He is a pro doing opposition activism. It is his business and he is a professional lobbyist. I wonder what his salary is. He worked as a House of Commons researcher, Communications Director for a group working for former Prime Minister Tony Blair. He is not an unpaid volunteer. I agree with a lot of his positions but he is no amateur, setting up this petition. That photo does not appear anywhere in their online literature that I could find. There are 50k members and 180 chapters. I wonder how many bothered to read any of the positions of the organization or knew the background of the person who started it, before they signed the petition. Or their (SCI) conservation efforts bringing almost extinct species back from the brink and re-populated (some back to the nuisance scale.) Wild turkeys for one! This is a self-serving hit - plain and simple, using the band, and their popularity, to garner attention before some big political events this week. And sully the reputation of the band. They are just collateral damage for him. And a tool to raise his own profile and agenda. The SCI organization is not centered on trophy hunting. In fact it traces hunting as the survival skill going back to the beginning of mankind. Part of what they (SCI) raise goes for anti-poaching. (Ivory from elephants, etc. ) It looks like a false representation of what the organization’s prime goals are. And, I hope they (SCI) sue him into oblivion. I don’t agree with trophy hunting, because I think it is stupid, to go anywhere near a beast that could eat you for a snack, but this is not that. It is political. edgoncalves.wordpress.com/about/
|
|
|
Post by AGD on Feb 2, 2020 17:51:48 GMT -5
From their own website:
"Safari Club International is a U.S.-based organization of more than 50,000 hunters dedicated to protecting the right to hunt and to promote wildlife conservation worldwide."
"Hunting is under constant attack by anti-hunters who introduce legislation and use the courts to stop hunting. SCI employs staff, contractors and volunteers in a team effort to fight for hunting. SCI operates in the U.S. Congress, in the state legislatures and wildlife commissions, in Canada, in the European Union and elsewhere internationally."
They promote, and actively lobby for, the right to continue to kill animals with guns. Care to explain to me exaclty how that's conservation ? You're saving something by killing it ? Some of these "hunts" are of captive species on raches in the US, so essentially they're breeding species purely for "hunting". Furthermore, SCI has strong links to the NRA.
And if you don't find any/all of this utterly disgusting then I don't want to know or interact with you in any way.
|
|
|
Post by andrewhickey on Feb 2, 2020 18:28:06 GMT -5
Not signing the petition because I'm not actually going to boycott them and I'm not going to lie about stuff like that, but I do hope they pull out (though I imagine if they did so this close to the event there would be a massive kill fee, no pun intended). As for it being against the members' convictions -- it's entirely possible that they have no idea what they've been booked for, or wouldn't have had til this blew up. I get the impression that they take any gig that will pay their fee, pretty much.
|
|
|
Post by drbeachboy (Dirk) on Feb 2, 2020 19:51:40 GMT -5
From their own website: "Safari Club International is a U.S.-based organization of more than 50,000 hunters dedicated to protecting the right to hunt and to promote wildlife conservation worldwide." "Hunting is under constant attack by anti-hunters who introduce legislation and use the courts to stop hunting. SCI employs staff, contractors and volunteers in a team effort to fight for hunting. SCI operates in the U.S. Congress, in the state legislatures and wildlife commissions, in Canada, in the European Union and elsewhere internationally." They promote, and actively lobby for, the right to continue to kill animals with guns. Care to explain to me exaclty how that's conservation ? You're saving something by killing it ? Some of these "hunts" are of captive species on raches in the US, so essentially they're breeding species purely for "hunting". Furthermore, SCI has strong links to the NRA. And if you don't find any/all of this utterly disgusting then I don't want to know or interact with you in any way. Theodore Roosevelt was a big game hunter here in the U.S. and Africa. Yet, he is responsible for the whole U.S. National Park System. And for the protection of many of the animals in those parks. While I am not totally against hunting, I don’t understand why some want to risk the extinction of many of the protected animals that are holding on by a thread, as man continues to kill them or destroy much of their habitat.
|
|