|
Post by sailor68 on Apr 23, 2024 14:10:44 GMT -5
man i wonder if they'll ever release a concert film from the 70s.
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Apr 23, 2024 14:37:26 GMT -5
What's a "knacker". Is that the same as a "nard" or a "gonad"? Haha! Yep, I guess that's Aussie 'slang' for ya. 'Gonad', hehe, what a funny word that is. Not a Moody Blues song then?
|
|
nater
Kahuna
Posts: 193
Likes: 370
|
Post by nater on Apr 23, 2024 22:17:21 GMT -5
I'm so upset the powers at be are essentially re-writing history by not including the entire story from '61-present day.
There are so few bands with a 60+ year career, and to me, that's one of the band's definitive aspects. That they've always continued to this day. I'm just as interested in '74-2024 and love all that music just as much. It's just a shame to cut things off in 1980. Hell, when I think about, in hindsight, '74 and '80 are still only 13 and 19 years into a 63 (at the time of typing this) year old band's career!! There's another 40+ years to cover when you stop there.
WTF!
And I don't feel like I'm bitching for no reason. We were told the book/movie were the DEFINITIVE representation of The Beach Boys' career and story.
So I did some quick math...
If the movie goes til '74, (for a band that has continued until 2024) it only covers 21.88% of their career. Less than a quarter.
If the movie, like the book, goes until '80, it only covers 31.25% of their career.
And that's considered definitive?!?
Let's be generous and say it goes til '80 --- that 31% number --- If we take that percent and it apply it to The Beatles story (which effectively begins in '57, but for sake of conversation let's say '62... and ended in '70) the equivalent amount of time (31%) would be 2.79 years of The Beatles' story, basically 62-65.
STOPPING AT 'ENDLESS SUMMER' IS LIKE STOPPING AT 'A COLLECTION OF BEATLES OLDIES'
If it really stops at '74 we're missing (and this is truly only scratching the surface as you all know)...
1975-77: Massive Touring Success, Brian's Back [15BO, LY!], Pacific Ocean Blue, Landy's initial run, helping reunite Jan & Dean,
78-80: MIU in Iowa, Bruce's return [LA and KTSA], First DC 4th Of July Show, Knebworth Concert,
1981-84: The continuation of the 4th Of July shows, Mike and Carl's solo careers, Playing For Reagan, Denny's passing, Landy's unfortunate return, Foskett
85-89: BB85, California Dreamin, Kokomo, Still Cruisin, R&R Hall Of Fame, Brian's solo debut... Stamos
90's: SIP, Full House, Stars & Stripes, 'Reunion Sessions', Carl's passing, BW marrying Melinda and finally getting rid of Landy, Matt Jardine becoming the first second generation BB to perform in the band, Mike's authorship lawsuits
98-Present: The BBs continuing as a performing act despite all odds, Brian becoming a solo performer despite all odds, Sounds of Summer, the two respective Smile releases, C50, TWGMTR, David [somewhat] rising above his 'Lost BB' status, the Iconic deal, the archival releases, a debut at The Grand Ole opry in '22, a Hollywood Bowl 4th of July in '23
Like I said, what I listed here is just scratching the surface.
But at least Endless Harmony acknowledged those years happening, even if it's a brief segment at the end of the movie, where John Stamos says something like "I think the 90's have been smooth sailing" (which I think they were anything but hahaha)
They're literally about to be on a tour celebrating 50 years since ES, which makes the point even more obvious that stopping there is just leaving too much out. When you think about it, MORE of the band's career has taken place AFTER the cutoff, whether it's '74 or '80, than is what's INCLUDED!
I don't think I'd be nearly as upset if words like 'definitive' weren't being tossed around. To me, a 'definitive' piece would treat SIP as seriously as SDSN, or would take the Full House appearances as seriously as the Ed Sullivan appearances. Because it's ALL part of their history.
Am I the only one who thinks it's just mind boggling and, frankly, shocking and disappointing that the book/film we've all hoped to be the equivalents to Beatles Anthology cover such a BRIEF amount of time of a 63+ YEAR career!?
To me, it's just really disrespectful almost. Disrespectful to all the hard work they all put in.
You think Carl continued to persevere through all of his health problems (to the point of using a fricken oxygen tank onstage) only for those years to essentially be wiped away? To me stories like that are just as meaningful as what happened in their 'golden years'...
And what about Mike and Bruce continuing for the past 26 years, into their 80's!?! These men in their 80's will be playing huge music festivals all summer. How is that not notable?!
Ok, rant over. I don't mean to sound angry or entitled. I'm just passionate.
One only has to read my other posts on this forum to be reminded of what I'll say again---
I'm still thankful for anything BBs related we get. I understand that I, like most of you, are in the deepest depths of fandom, and it's pretty much impossible to please us across the board... Whether it's the audio remastering, the choice of concert venues (who remembers hunting event lmfao), or years covered in a doc (which evidently is a sensitive subject for me haha)... It's impossible to please us all.
I think there are clearly smart and passionate people leading these things, so I guess I do still have some level on faith. (However unwarranted)
I do see why Iconic, Disney, and maybe even the band themselves are comfortable with their main story being from 61-74. I know that allows them to forget about most of their most painful times, and paint a story of relative win after win after win...
But what got me hooked on this band was the fact they've had such a long career that still continues to this day. I can learn about The BBs in a past tense way, learning about their history. But I can also *still* go to a BBs concert today. That's something so unique and profound.
With all of this being said, even if the movie ends at that 21% or 35% mark, I'm sure I'll still dig it. Seeing the paradise cove reunion and new interviews are surely worth price of admission. I am still very excited and grateful for this movie, and for the new level of attention the band has been getting. I guess I just need some Love & Mercy when it comes to having faith in the 'powers that be' that I've been sorta giving a hard time. I am thankful, excited, and do my best to be as appreciative as I can. But I am also passionate, and truth be told, have few outlets to speak on these matters, so I suppose this is the best, and one of my only, places to share these thoughts. I know this was a lot, but there was a lot I was trying to express. I don't doubt, based on reactions I'm already seeing, many of you feel similarly.
[There's also a chance the rest of the career is somehow adequately addressed in the movie, and my rant will have been pointless, but I won't get my hopes up. Seem like some folks around here who are usually quite reliable with their info are already saying it ends at the points I've discussed...]
|
|
|
Post by lonelysummer on Apr 23, 2024 23:50:14 GMT -5
The more I read about this documentary, the less disappointed I am in not being able to see it, due to not being a Disney subscriber. It appears to me that it's just going to be a retread of Endless Harmony and American Band. I have both of those, can watch them anytime I want. If I want something Brian-specific, I have I Just Wasn't Made for These Times. I think this was the last chance for a good, comprehensive doc on the Boys. The Powers That Be blew it again.
|
|
|
Post by AGD on Apr 24, 2024 0:44:07 GMT -5
I'm so upset the powers at be are essentially re-writing history by not including the entire story from '61-present day.
There are so few bands with a 60+ year career, and to me, that's one of the band's definitive aspects. That they've always continued to this day. I'm just as interested in '74-2024 and love all that music just as much. It's just a shame to cut things off in 1980. Hell, when I think about, in hindsight, '74 and '80 are still only 13 and 19 years into a 63 (at the time of typing this) year old band's career!! There's another 40+ years to cover when you stop there.
WTF!
And I don't feel like I'm bitching for no reason. We were told the book/movie were the DEFINITIVE representation of The Beach Boys' career and story.
So I did some quick math...
If the movie goes til '74, (for a band that has continued until 2024) it only covers 21.88% of their career. Less than a quarter.
If the movie, like the book, goes until '80, it only covers 31.25% of their career.
And that's considered definitive?!?
Let's be generous and say it goes til '80 --- that 31% number --- If we take that percent and it apply it to The Beatles story (which effectively begins in '57, but for sake of conversation let's say '62... and ended in '70) the equivalent amount of time (31%) would be 2.79 years of The Beatles' story, basically 62-65.
STOPPING AT 'ENDLESS SUMMER' IS LIKE STOPPING AT 'A COLLECTION OF BEATLES OLDIES'
If it really stops at '74 we're missing (and this is truly only scratching the surface as you all know)...
1975-77: Massive Touring Success, Brian's Back [15BO, LY!], Pacific Ocean Blue, Landy's initial run, helping reunite Jan & Dean,
78-80: MIU in Iowa, Bruce's return [LA and KTSA], First DC 4th Of July Show, Knebworth Concert,
1981-84: The continuation of the 4th Of July shows, Mike and Carl's solo careers, Playing For Reagan, Denny's passing, Landy's unfortunate return, Foskett
85-89: BB85, California Dreamin, Kokomo, Still Cruisin, R&R Hall Of Fame, Brian's solo debut... Stamos
90's: SIP, Full House, Stars & Stripes, 'Reunion Sessions', Carl's passing, BW marrying Melinda and finally getting rid of Landy, Matt Jardine becoming the first second generation BB to perform in the band, Mike's authorship lawsuits
98-Present: The BBs continuing as a performing act despite all odds, Brian becoming a solo performer despite all odds, Sounds of Summer, the two respective Smile releases, C50, TWGMTR, David [somewhat] rising above his 'Lost BB' status, the Iconic deal, the archival releases, a debut at The Grand Ole opry in '22, a Hollywood Bowl 4th of July in '23
Like I said, what I listed here is just scratching the surface.
But at least Endless Harmony acknowledged those years happening, even if it's a brief segment at the end of the movie, where John Stamos says something like "I think the 90's have been smooth sailing" (which I think they were anything but hahaha)
They're literally about to be on a tour celebrating 50 years since ES, which makes the point even more obvious that stopping there is just leaving too much out. When you think about it, MORE of the band's career has taken place AFTER the cutoff, whether it's '74 or '80, than is what's INCLUDED!
I don't think I'd be nearly as upset if words like 'definitive' weren't being tossed around. To me, a 'definitive' piece would treat SIP as seriously as SDSN, or would take the Full House appearances as seriously as the Ed Sullivan appearances. Because it's ALL part of their history.
Am I the only one who thinks it's just mind boggling and, frankly, shocking and disappointing that the book/film we've all hoped to be the equivalents to Beatles Anthology cover such a BRIEF amount of time of a 63+ YEAR career!?
To me, it's just really disrespectful almost. Disrespectful to all the hard work they all put in.
You think Carl continued to persevere through all of his health problems (to the point of using a fricken oxygen tank onstage) only for those years to essentially be wiped away? To me stories like that are just as meaningful as what happened in their 'golden years'...
And what about Mike and Bruce continuing for the past 26 years, into their 80's!?! These men in their 80's will be playing huge music festivals all summer. How is that not notable?!
Ok, rant over. I don't mean to sound angry or entitled. I'm just passionate.
One only has to read my other posts on this forum to be reminded of what I'll say again---
I'm still thankful for anything BBs related we get. I understand that I, like most of you, are in the deepest depths of fandom, and it's pretty much impossible to please us across the board... Whether it's the audio remastering, the choice of concert venues (who remembers hunting event lmfao), or years covered in a doc (which evidently is a sensitive subject for me haha)... It's impossible to please us all.
I think there are clearly smart and passionate people leading these things, so I guess I do still have some level on faith. (However unwarranted)
I do see why Iconic, Disney, and maybe even the band themselves are comfortable with their main story being from 61-74. I know that allows them to forget about most of their most painful times, and paint a story of relative win after win after win...
But what got me hooked on this band was the fact they've had such a long career that still continues to this day. I can learn about The BBs in a past tense way, learning about their history. But I can also *still* go to a BBs concert today. That's something so unique and profound.
With all of this being said, even if the movie ends at that 21% or 35% mark, I'm sure I'll still dig it. Seeing the paradise cove reunion and new interviews are surely worth price of admission. I am still very excited and grateful for this movie, and for the new level of attention the band has been getting. I guess I just need some Love & Mercy when it comes to having faith in the 'powers that be' that I've been sorta giving a hard time. I am thankful, excited, and do my best to be as appreciative as I can. But I am also passionate, and truth be told, have few outlets to speak on these matters, so I suppose this is the best, and one of my only, places to share these thoughts. I know this was a lot, but there was a lot I was trying to express. I don't doubt, based on reactions I'm already seeing, many of you feel similarly.
[There's also a chance the rest of the career is somehow adequately addressed in the movie, and my rant will have been pointless, but I won't get my hopes up. Seem like some folks around here who are usually quite reliable with their info are already saying it ends at the points I've discussed...]
Chill out man, it's just a book and a documentary - not the answer to world peace and limitless clean power that's being witheld! It's just music, is all. Great, great music but... still, just music. A fact that may be unplatable to you and many here: the vast majority of the watching & listening public don't care anything like as much as we do, and both items will be a complete revelation to them. They'll learn things they never knew existed. I think that's a good thing. UF #2: no-one would even propose, much less fund and make, anything along the lines of The Beatles Anthology, because they're not The Beatles. No one is. Maybe Taylor Swift these days. Think: when was the last time you saw a book or doc like this about the likes of Elton, The Who or The Stones? Or anyone except Elvis and MJ. I agree, it's not perfect but it's been explained here and elsewhere why they cut off when they do. The alternative is... nothing. I know what I'd rather have. I'm coming round to the idea that BB fans can be the most demanding and least grateful there are (yeah, I know this is me speaking: I plead The Whitman Defence*). Sometimes we have reason, as of late, but mostly it's a constant chorus of "I want more, and now". FFS, folk here are bitching about a film no-one here or in the greater BB fan world has seen yet! At least wait, watch it and then complain. Frankly I wouldn't blame the people at BRI/IAG if they said "enough, we're done, we don't need this ****". And breathe... I'm away Saturday for eleven days to one of my Very Favourite Places and man, I need this break. Work has become an utter nightmare and sometimes this place is less the oasis it used to be. Oh, and while I'm on a roll, the vast majority of the AI stuff is "amazing" only in the sense of how amazingly unlike the BB it sounds. [* Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.) Walt Whitman, Song of Myself section 51]
|
|
petsite
Author/Historian/ Researcher
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 3,247
|
Post by petsite on Apr 24, 2024 1:19:58 GMT -5
AGD said:
Chill out man, it's just a book and a documentary - not the answer to world peace and limitless clean power that's being witheld! It's just music, is all. Great, great music but... still, just music.
A fact that may be unplatable to you and many here: the vast majority of the watching & listening public don't care anything like as much as we do, and both items will be a complete revelation to them. They'll learn things they never knew existed. I think that's a good thing. UF #2: no-one would even propose, much less fund and make, anything along the lines of The Beatles Anthology, because they're not The Beatles. No one is. Maybe Taylor Swift these days. Think: when was the last time you saw a book or doc like this about the likes of Elton, The Who or The Stones? Or anyone except Elvis and MJ. I agree, it's not perfect but it's been explained here and elsewhere why they cut off when they do. The alternative is... nothing. I know what I'd rather have. I'm coming round to the idea that BB fans can be the most demanding and least grateful there are (yeah, I know this is me speaking: I plead The Whitman Defence*). Sometimes we have reason, as of late, but mostly it's a constant chorus of "I want more, and now". FFS, folk here are bitching about a film no-one here or in the greater BB fan world has seen yet! At least wait, watch it and then complain. Frankly I wouldn't blame the people at BRI/IAG if they said "enough, we're done, we don't need this ****".
And breathe...
I'm away Saturday for eleven days to one of my Very Favourite Places and man, I need this break. Work has become an utter nightmare and sometimes this place is less the oasis it used to be. Oh, and while I'm on a roll, the vast majority of the AI stuff is "amazing" only in the sense of how amazingly unlike the BB it sounds.
[* Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Walt Whitman, Song of Myself section 51]
AGD is correct. I helped out in the late stages of this project, mostly to bring them information they couldn't seem to find, and to also fill in blanks that they had. Their knowledge in areas was lacking or incorrect, and that seemed to come from other sources. I am not blowing my own horn, I just have the articles etc. to back up certain facts. That and photos is where I helped.
I am saying all of this because I want to be clear as to what this documentary is NOT. It is NOT a comprehensive overview of the group's 60+ years history. Frankly, that would take an ANTHOLOGY type project and no one seems to want to spend the money on such a project. I still remember when ENDLESS HARMONY was coming out that the CD soundtrack was going to be a 2 Disc set, but Capitol squashed that because HEY, ITS THE BEACH BOYS, NOT THE BEATLES. THEY CAN'T SELL A 2 CD SET. Of course, this is the same Capitol that was left scratching their heads (and other body parts) just utterly (and I really do mean they were shocked) aghast that the GOOD VIBRATIONS box sold as well as it did AND got great across the board reviews. I talked with catalog people back then and they were like HOW THE F**K DID THE BEACH BOYS SELL THAT MANY SETS. THEY AREN'T THAT GOOD AND THEY WEREN'T COOL. Capitol wouldn't even push to get that box nominated for a Grammy, which went to a WOODSTOCK box that was being HYPED because IT WAS SOCIALLY RELEVANT compared to the Beach Boys, though it sold in small numbers.
The reason 1974 was picked, was because that was when the guys were back on the upswing. I pushed to go to 1975 and finish on the CHICAGO/BEACH BOYS tour. That was a monumental tour that during a real downturn in the economy, sold out arenas all over. But 1974 was chosen because of the upswing AND those two words that defined the group ever after - ENDLESS SUMMER. But at least we were able to get the 70s in there, so we could discuss what a contribution Carl Wilson made to the group during those times (and really from then on). That SUNFLOWER / SURF'S UP / CATP / HOLLAND are all going to be discussed is truly great. And some really rare video is suppose to accompany this doc. I hope its true. As my contact said to me, THIS PROBABLY WON'T KNOCK THE SOCKS OFF OF SOMEONE LIKE YOU BOB, BUT WE ARE DOING IT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
Concentrating on that time frame will drive the point home. That truly is their best music.
|
|
|
Post by E on Apr 24, 2024 3:57:25 GMT -5
Amen.
|
|
west
Kahuna
Posts: 109
Likes: 102
|
Post by west on Apr 24, 2024 10:31:40 GMT -5
Considering that it took the Endless Harmony doc about 80 minutes to get to the Anaheim '76 show, I'll look at this as an 'extended edition/director's cut' of a movie I really enjoy. And I don't mean that in a bad way. I'll have an extra 40 minutes to hear more about (hopefully) David's tenure, the Smiley Smile/Wild Honey/Friends era, the move to Warner, Ricky and Blondie. That's not even mentioning things that were completely skipped over in the 1998 doc, such as Jack Rieley, Party, (I hate that they'll probably include this one) Manson, 'Fire' sessions, Dennis' late 60s/early 70s rise, the horrid '68 tours, CaTP and In Concert, Brother Records.
40 extra minutes could go a long way! As I stated before, I'd love an Anthology-type release, but I know it won't happen. And that's okay. I'll still be planted in front of my TV when this new one airs.
|
|
|
Post by northcoast on Apr 24, 2024 15:12:14 GMT -5
Folks this doc cannot stop at 1974 as the trailer shows footage from the 1976 NBC television special. Unless that is a big tease.
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Apr 24, 2024 15:16:09 GMT -5
1974 might be a good time to wrap the doc if Iconic/Brother have the foresight to time its broadcast to coincide with the release of a sensibly priced, multi-disc, super deluxe boxed set, centred on the gigs recorded for the 1974 double In Concert album. If the doc is going to give the impression that that’s when the band was at its peak, it could be the best publicity any such sensibly priced, retrospective boxed set could ever have.
What are the odds?
|
|
|
Post by debonbon on Apr 25, 2024 6:30:32 GMT -5
Nothing good came out after 1970s, I think it’s a smart move.
edit to add the Stones’ doco Crossfire Hurricane only covers a short segment of the band’s career and it’s easily the best documentary made about them.
|
|
|
Post by KenWorthing on Apr 25, 2024 6:56:59 GMT -5
1974 might be a good time to wrap the doc if Iconic/Brother have the foresight to time its broadcast to coincide with the release of a sensibly priced, multi-disc, super deluxe boxed set, centred on the gigs recorded for the 1974 double In Concert album. If the doc is going to give the impression that that’s when the band was at its peak, it could be the best publicity any such sensibly priced, retrospective boxed set could ever have. What are the odds?.. Slim to None .. and Slim's just left town ..
|
|
|
Post by AGD on Apr 25, 2024 6:59:24 GMT -5
Folks this doc cannot stop at 1974 as the trailer shows footage from the 1976 NBC television special. Unless that is a big tease. That it does, but I'm thinking it's either for archive interviews, or just generic concert footage. let's face it, aside from the likes of us here or on other BB boards, who's going to realise that? Having watched the trailer again, I'm betting I'm not gonna make it through without throwing something at the screen every time Don Was singgers at one of his stunningly original* observations... [* denotes heavy sarcasm]
|
|
petsite
Author/Historian/ Researcher
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 3,247
|
Post by petsite on Apr 25, 2024 9:13:15 GMT -5
Folks this doc cannot stop at 1974 as the trailer shows footage from the 1976 NBC television special. Unless that is a big tease. That it does, but I'm thinking it's either for archive interviews, or just generic concert footage. let's face it, aside from the likes of us here or on other BB boards, who's going to realise that? Having watched the trailer again, I'm betting I'm not gonna make it through without throwing something at the screen every time Don Was singgers at one of his stunningly original* observations... [* denotes heavy sarcasm] AGD, are you not a Don Was fan?
|
|
|
Post by sailorwailer123 on Apr 25, 2024 11:00:47 GMT -5
No disrespect to Don Was, but the dude said on the documentary Long Promised Road that there is a harmonica and a banjo on GOK, and afaik there’s nothing of the sort on that track.
If anyone has any updates on the soundtrack feel free to share!
|
|
west
Kahuna
Posts: 109
Likes: 102
|
Post by west on Apr 25, 2024 11:23:21 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you.
|
|
|
Post by AGD on Apr 25, 2024 11:48:16 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you. Check out his production resume. None too shabby.
|
|
|
Post by Matt H on Apr 25, 2024 12:10:52 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you. Check out his production resume. None too shabby. He has a great Production resume (Bonnie Raitt, Rolling Stones, etc), and been involved with Brian on recordings and a champion for him, which is fine, but he comes off a little over the top in some of his appearances. A great example is in past appearances he acts like no one has any idea how Brian did what he did in the studio. We do know, we have the session tapes, its clear how he did it, maybe not how he thought it up, but how it was done is clear. The way he talks about it and being completely astounded is where I believe it is over the top.
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Apr 25, 2024 13:52:53 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you. Was Was not in Was Not Was?
|
|
|
Post by Matt H on Apr 25, 2024 14:01:08 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you. Was Was not in Was Not Was? He was
|
|
|
Post by John Manning on Apr 25, 2024 14:11:10 GMT -5
Was Was not in Was Not Was? He was i looked it up. There was a Was and another Was in Was Not Was. I’m not sure if Was was the Was or the Not Was. If he was the Not Was then he was not the Was.
|
|
|
Post by jk on Apr 25, 2024 17:14:16 GMT -5
Aside from interviews in many a music documentary, playing bass with what was left of the Doors at their HoF induction, and playing bass at one of Brian's early 1990s gigs, I can't really tell you anything else about Don Was. Solo artist, producer, member of a band... I couldn't tell you. Was Was not in Was Not Was? You forgot the brackets!! The semi-pro band I was in used to play "Walk The Dinosaur": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Was_(Not_Was)
|
|
|
Post by Emdeeh on Apr 26, 2024 19:14:31 GMT -5
Here are the cities (no Atlanta, alas):
* AMC Lincoln Square, NY * Regal Houston Marq*E, Houston, TX * AMC Northpark, Dallas, TX * AMC Boston Commons, Boston, MA * AMC Metreon, San Francisco, CA * AMC Tyson’s Corner, Washington, DC * AMC Thoroughbred, Nashville, TN * AMC Highlands, Denver, CO * Regal City North, Chicago, IL * AMC Mission Valley, San Diego, CA * AMC Woodlands Square, Oldsmar, FL * AMC Rolling Hills, Torrance, CA
Hopefully this will wind up as bonus material on a Bluray/DVD release....
|
|
rjm
Kahuna
Posts: 212
Likes: 221
|
Post by rjm on Apr 26, 2024 21:35:51 GMT -5
i looked it up. There was a Was and another Was in Was Not Was. I’m not sure if Was was the Was or the Not Was. If he was the Not Was then he was not the Was. Wise guy.
|
|
|
Post by newbbfan on Apr 27, 2024 12:33:10 GMT -5
Just signed up to see the documentary here in California which is in the theater in Torrance which has many of you know is quite close to Redondo Beach not too terribly far from Hawthorne and well it's in the south bay.
When you click on this they don't ask you for any money so I guess it's a free screening on the first coming first come basis? In any case they don't tell you that you're in but they tell you that they'll email you later and you getting on a first come first serve basis and we'll get further instructions so it's a little ambiguous.
I like the feeling of having a ticket in my pocket for what I'm attending not a promise for more information later, but I guess for anyone else signed up as well let's keep each other posted. Thank you for the information
|
|